New form of anti-male oppression discovered: Women’s magazines in checkout lines!
Yeah, I know you've all seen this one before, but, come on! It's funny!
Over on Reddit’s Men’s Rights subreddit, cheester warns all of us dudes about an especially insidious form of anti-male oppression: the racks of women’s magazines that lurk near the checkout counters of grocery stores everywhere!
can I get some feedback on womens magazines at the grocery checkout? Every issue states “new tricks he doesn’t know in bed” and shite like that. It’s obvious porn for the gals but why is it so accepted by everyone that it has carte blanche to be within a two foot reach as I pay for my food? If a magazine for men had on the cover: “20 Ways To Make Her Squirm Like A Fish”….there would be a national outrage.
Yeah, it’s not like Men’s magazines ever run anything like that.
Church groups and womens rights would say it demoralizes women and have the publication banned or put behind censored racks in seedy smoke shops.
Yeah. It’s not like this ever happens to women’s magazines.
But the womens mags are right there as a last shop item in the flourescent lit, sterilized, family atmosphere where every mother parades her toddlers and kids right past the 3 letter word in big black block letters;SEX on the cover of every flashy colored womens mag that comes out each month.
Not only is this oppression of men, it’s oppression of all toddlers who can read and know what the word “sex” means.
Also, feminists have never criticized women’s magazines in any way. “Ten Ways to Make Him Squirm” articles are the distilled essence of feminism! And most of them are written by the ghost of Andrea Dworkin.
NOTE: Does this even need a “sarcasm” tag?
Like this:
Posted on December 1, 2011, in evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, idiocy, oppressed men, reddit, sex. Bookmark the permalink. 856 Comments.
Maybe they can have a side business making snuff movies of all the, um, entertainers who for some reason just can’t seem to adjust to their fine and perfect new lives.
Meller: You said that promiscuous women would be given to these houses of entertainment and that this would make their families grateful.
That’s nothing like a free market solution. It’s some sort of servitude.
I also EXPLICITLY provided for the availability of other sources of education and employment for women,
If they were some sort of genetic freak and their father approved of it… otherwise home-ec and basic literacy is enough for any real woman.
“I may not be the most effective advocate of a given scenario, but I think that proper reading would make my position clear without biased distortion.”
It has, you just dislike that proper reading. Happily for us, when we try to tell people what you said, it’s all there, just as you wrote it.
Thank you for the lead regarding Marie Osmond and her collectors edition of Little Lady Lovelies. My current collection of LLLs is quite adaquate, sooner or later a place will open up in my “harem”, and one or two shall be welcomed.
I forgot about them, until you reminded me, zhinxi, about Marie Osmond’s collection. No, she would not be useful in Houses of Entertainment, and she would be useful in her career as an indepedent Songstress, and as a collectable doll creator.
Most of them seem to be too young to be useful to me, but there are a few who would be welcome!
Maybe her LDS upbringing rendered her more-or-less immune to the dreadful feminuttery and its attendent gender-equality psychosis polluting our society when she was growing up, and this is pleasingly reflected in her dolls!
As far as Houses of Entertainment for oversexed or sexually wayward girls, if there are better alternatives for them, I am happy, as always, to stand corrected.There is nothing about women where I wish any harm or hardship to them, and as I said before, “you can catch more flies with honey than with vinegar”. If people want a world of female “scientists” or ‘test pilots”, Lord Help us All, but as I always say, stranger things have happened! This won’t stop the dedicated Mellerphobes here, but it does show that I can change my mind when confronted with contrary evidence.
Thanx for the leads for Little Lady Lovelies!
Meller: As far as Houses of Entertainment for oversexed or sexually wayward girls, if there are better alternatives for them, I am happy, as always, to stand corrected.
No, you aren’t. When it’s pointed out there is no need to find, “alternatives”, because there is 1: nothing wrong with them and 2: nothing about being sexually active precludes other active realms of endeavour (after all, any number of men have had “promiscuous and oversexed lives” and done quite well. Henry VIII, the Duke of Wellington, to name but two).
So you aren’t willing to take corrections, when presented with contrary evidence but rather you merely bob and weave and pretend you didn’t say what is still in print for all to read.
It’s been repeatedly explained to you that the best alternative for sexually wayward girls is for them to seek the career of their choice via college, trade school, or employers, much the way people do.
You don’t have to act all “well, I suppose so, if you insist” about this.
Actually, I want a world of female scientists and test pilots. Different thing. See, in my world, when women are scientists, they actually are scientists.
A lot of them already are, too. Lord help you, I guess.
Pecunium-a.k.a. Mindreading telepath #1- December9, 2011 @12:43pm-
And now you know what I am thinking? You REALLY KNOW whether or not I learn from good suggestions from my fans?
Your feminist girlfriend is calling. She wants cuddling! Do something that you might know how to do, for a change!
Well, and since it’s never gonna happen anyway, I guess it doesn’t really matter what kinds of alternatives to your bizarre sexual fantasy world we convince you of, huh?
You’re totes free to use your dream of Meller’s House of Entertainment for Oversexed Girls as jerkoff material, champ. Just realize that telling other people about it guarantees your ostracism from polite society.
Speaking of which, I found you a girlfriend. She’s properly covered, 3 feet tall, ON SALE, **NOT CREEPY AT ALL!!!!!**, and very very pretty. Have fun.
Actually, Lady Michelle’s dress is a little low-cut. Saucebox! Slattern! Back to the House of Oversexed Wayward Dolls with you!
Feel free to type your reply with both hands, Meller.
“Your girlfriend wants to cuddle with you and I bet you’re good at that” is the most revealing attempt at an insult ever.
oooh, buuuurn
MelllerLAnd now you know what I am thinking? You REALLY KNOW whether or not I learn from good suggestions from my fans?
What, are you trying to say we are your fans?
I’m not claiming to read your mind. I am describing what you have done, and comparing it to what you have said.
As in the past, you really dislike it when people do that.
But, you can prove me wrong. State, categorically, and without reservation that abusers are solely responsible for making the decision to abuse.
Say that women should be free to do whatever they want, with no restrictions placed on them.
Because those are the two most recent things “your fans” here have provided evidence to support; which you have, as per norm, refused take correction on.
Your “fans,” Meller? Whatever gets you through the night, but I’d hardly call a bunch of people who think you’re sexist, racist, doll-wanking freak your fans.
Meller: Your feminist girlfriend is calling. She wants cuddling!
She’s at work. I am, however, doing things I’m good at. I’m making your folly plain, and I’m making supper (a tabouli, with no lemon; using short-pickled persian cukes and celery with some rice vinegar for the acid), a braised brisket with turnips, carrots, celery and marrow, and some homemade noodles).
In between times I’m practicing some shooting, and rebuilding the hard drive that crashed on the computer. Tomorrow I’ll go to work, and someone else will be making dinner.
I just threw up a little. That’s… so far beyond disturbing I’m not sure there’s a word for it. If you want to wank with dolls or plushies, Meller, have at it. Just don’t tell the rest of us about it. Please.
I don’t really give a shit about Meller’s doll fetish, myself. It’s his desire to turn actual human women into what are essentially dolls made of meat that I find disturbing.
And even that, if he accepted it as a kink and tried to find healthy, non-harmful ways to play it out, I wouldn’t have a problem with.
Fan/fan/Noun: 1.An apparatus with rotating blades that creates a current of air for cooling or ventilation.
2.A person who has a strong interest in or admiration for a particular sport, art or entertainment form, or famous person.
You don’t have any fans, Meller, unless you meant that you have an apparatus with rotating blades and you think that it talks to you. (That wouldn’t surprise me at this point, what with the dolls and all.) Everyone here thinks that you’re a deranged lunatic, and rather pathetic. You’re a sad, lonely old man who’s been reduced to playing with dolls because you can’t figure out a way to remove free will from actual real life women.
BTW, “I bet you’re good at cuddling your girlfriend!” is the least effective insult of all time, especially coming from someone who has nothing to cuddle except his Madame Alexander collection.