Men’s Rights website falsely accuses Ohio University student of being a false rape accuser

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c): False accuser

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c): False accuser

Well, this is depressing. The Raw Story is reporting that

An Ohio University sophomore has deactivated her social media accounts and is afraid to leave her house after she was falsely identified as the woman who reported she’d been raped in an incident captured on cell phone video by a passerby.

The student, Rachel Cassidy, now falsely accused of being a false rape accuser, has had her personal information — not just her name but her address, the name of her sorority, her social media accounts, even her Pinterest page — listed on a Men’s Rights site called Crimes Against Fathers. (I won’t link to it.)

The man behind Crimes Against Fathers? None other than the notorious Men’s Rights extremist and crackpot Peter Andrew Nolan — or, as he prefers to be known, for reasons I don’t fully understand, Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) . Apparently taking inspiration from Paul Elam’s Register-Her.com, Nolan’s site does what Register-Her only threatened to do: it actually releases the personal information of those it identifies as “Man-Hating Women.” He will even add names of women you don’t like to the list for a fee of $70 (Australian).

So far the site has several hundred women listed, most of them apparently women who have run afoul of Nolan or his most active lieutenant on the site, the pseudonymous “John Rambo” of “Boycott American Women” fame, either online or in real life. In most cases, luckily, the amount of personal information given out is relatively scanty and the number of people who’ve actually viewed the posts (which is listed on the site) has been small.

That’s not the case with Cassidy, whose life Nolan and “Rambo” have set out to ruin as thoroughly as they can. In addition to her personal information, the site has also dug up an assortment of pictures of her scraped from various sites on the internet.

And, unwilling to believe that she is not the woman in the video — and a false accuser of rape — the two have taken aim at those who’ve stepped forward to defend Cassidy. They’ve posted the personal information of Jenny Hall-Jones, the Dean of Students at Ohio University, for the “crime” of publicly saying that Cassidy is not the woman in the video, as well as several other women who’ve come out in support of Cassidy.

On Crimes Against Fathers, “Rambo” writes

[C]onsidering that women will always try to cover for their fellow women, and will NEVER hold their fellow women accountable, there is a very strong possibility that Jenny [Hall-Jones] is LYING and that Rachel Cassidy IS the girl in that video. This means that Jenny Hall-Jones is a CRIMINAL because she is covering up for the CRIME of making a false rape accusation. Therefore, she is a criminal and needs to be publicly exposed as such.

Neither “Rambo” nor Nolan has leveled similar accusations against Ohio University president Roderick McDavis, a man, though he too has said that the woman in the video is not Cassidy.

Men’s Rights activists like to say that Nolan isn’t really one of them. If this is the case, they should be willing to stand up and denounce his reprehensible actions, and the very idea of his Crimes Against Fathers “Man-Hating Women” directory.

EDITED TO ADD: I should note that Nolan’s site also has a “Name and Shame the IgnorMANuses” forum directed at alleged man-hating men, including Vince Gilligan (creator of Breaking Bad) and Nacho Vidal (the pseudonymous dude behind MGTOWforums.com). The list is considerably smaller than that of the Man-Hating Women directory, and none of the entries I saw listed any personal information that went much beyond links to Facebook pages.

About these ads

Posted on October 22, 2013, in a voice for men, antifeminism, crackpottery, doxing, evil women, false accusations, harassment, irony alert, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), rape, rape culture and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 172 Comments.

  1. gilllyrosebee - I don’t know if Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) is a boogerhead could keep a lid on it this long; I wasn’t around when Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) is a boogerhead was posting here but have a vague feeling Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) is a boogerhead went into rage-rant pretty quickly.

    Anyone who was around when Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) is a boogerhead was commenting remember?

    I like the extended version of Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) is a boogerhead’s name. :)

  2. Colon’s now a faux media star - if I was this interviewer, I would have torn his face off - she let him go too easy …

  3. Ok, that’s just weird… all the YouTube links go to a playlist about sports teams from the University of Ohio.

  4. Gawker is now covering this. GOOD. Drag these bigots out into the light of day so everyone can see what hateful terrorists they are.

  5. @David: I don’t know if you want to revisit this ugliness (rather than move onto new ugliness), but Nolan seems to have stopped fighting reality for a second and admit that Rachael Cassidy is not the woman in the video and hasn’t accused anyone of rape. And then Nolan gets right back to beating the crap out of reality.

    Nolan claims Rachael Cassidy deserves to be denounced and doxxed because she hasn’t publicly spoken out against “criminal women” who falsely accuse men of rape. Her parents are much, much worse because they raised a daughter who silently condones crimes against men AND they never had the decency to publicly condemn false rape accusers even once. And they’re at least 40 years old, so no excuses!

    He rejects Rachael and her parents boo-hooing in the press over the harassment because their suffering is nothing compared to pain felt by men destroyed by family courts or falsely accused of rape.

    Then things get really weird. This is from a public “letter” to the Cassidys.

    Now. Since you are both near my age, I am 49, you might want to talk to the people responsible for your daughter being outed like this. That would be my former father in law and mother in law. These two people were quite happy that I was criminally victimised in the family courts. They are quite happy for me to be falsely called a paedophile, a wife beater, a child abuser, a dead beat dad. These things are not a problem when it is women and men calling a MAN these things.

    Nolan then helpfully provides the contact info for his ex-In-Laws so the Cassidys can contact the people directly responsible for what happened to their daughter.

  6. Brooked: Well, that’s just vile.

    Is he trying to win “The Worst Person in the World” contest or something?

  7. I really hope he gets arrested.

  8. This guy really spends a lot more time knowingly breaking the law than most MRAs seem comfortable doing.

  9. Well he thinks it’s OK since he has symbols in his name.

  10. So signing things ~Argenti makes me legally untouchable? NICE!

    ~Argenti (yes I do actually do this)

  11. @the average stoic sophist of today

    Looks like you own Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) a bunch of gold for using his name without his permission.

    Wait, is peter andrew: nolan (c) being serious? And is there any way he thinks that’s enforceable…?

    @sparky

    So, if I stand in front of the bathroom mirror with the lights off and say “Peter-Andrew:Nolan (c)” three times, will he appear in the mirror and fine me 1,000 troy ounces of 99.99% pure gold?

    Because that would be really scary.

    XD so glad I wasn’t drinking anything.

    @brooked

    Nolan claims Rachael Cassidy deserves to be denounced and doxxed because she hasn’t publicly spoken out against “criminal women” who falsely accuse men of rape.

    …whaaa? That makes no fucking sense.

    @auggz

    I really hope he gets arrested.

    ditto. He’s terrible.

  12. So signing things ~Argenti makes me legally untouchable?

    Or makes you legally a 14-year-old girl. …And now I want to start a conspiracy theory that you have to write your name ~*~katz~*~ to free yourself from legal obligations.

    And do you think that Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) has a Google alert set for his name, so that every time someone types Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) it sends him an email alert?

    Almost certainly.

    Wait, is peter andrew: nolan (c) being serious?

    Terrifyingly enough, he is ALWAYS being serious.

  13. I actually really want him in jail, for everyone else’s safety and schadenfreude. Either that or him getting his pants sued off, and whining “but you can’t do that… There’s a colon, after Andrew, see?”.

  14. @katz

    Terrifyingly enough, he is ALWAYS being serious.

    Wow. :/

    ~*~Marie~*~

    Ps: Sorry, I had to sign it XD

  15. test

     Ʌ Ʌ
    = o o =
      ᵜ

  16. @kittehs

    Are we doing kitty faces? Or did I misunderstand? oh well, kitty faces anyway: =^.,.^=

  17. This is not a fixed-width font. ASCII art is not going to work.

  18. Yes, I’m trying to do kitty faces. I found a symbol that looks just like a kitty nose and mouth. :)

    Yeah, I tried the non-breaking space letters but they still came out wonky. If only the kitty smiley in the forums could be used here! /tragedy

  19. Well, I am the size of your average 14 year old girl. But really it’s just that when I first started doing this internet thing, I found signing my name as just Argenti plain weird (well, I wasn’t Argenti yet, but you get me) — I was used to paper, and ~ is the closest keyboards seem to have to something resembling handwriting.

    So if I “sign” an email to you, it ends…

    ~Argenti the vampire kitty =^;.;^=

  20. …it just ends ~Argenti

    The vampire kitty was cuz it’s kitty emote o’clock

  21. ..Ʌ….Ʌ
    …o…o…

  22. No, never mind, that fails.

  23. So Nolan has moved to the “if you’re not actively with us you’re against us and therefore a legitimate target” stage. I wonder how long it will take the rest of the MRM to catch up (egged on by the special FeMRA snowflakes).

  24. Isn’t it always kitty emote o’clock? :D

    Or kitty something o’clock, anyways.

    =^ͼ.ͽ^=

  25. Shocked kitty is suffering ear subsidence.

  26. =^o.o^=

    Shocked kitty?

    =^ͼ.ͽ^=

    Like this one :3

  27. I used the character map to get that one. :)

    Now, will the brackets show up as whiskers?

    >^: ; :^<

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,665 other followers

%d bloggers like this: