>"Women are …" Part One
>
 |
| What a fucking douchebag. |
Here are some of the things I have, er, “learned” about women from reading Men’s Rights/Men Going Their Own Way blogs and message boards.
This is part one in what will be, I suspect, a very lengthy series.
Women are: The missing link
All in all I am thoroughly convinced that women have all contempt for human life and are the missing link between apes and humans. This is a gender war, a GENDER WAR! and small innocent babies that are murdered and children that get abused are caught in the crossfires, and these females are utterly fucking useless and a waste of fucking breathing space. They have shown their true colors and we don’t need them anymore.
Women are: Nuclear waste
I have come to the conclusion that it’s not enough to avoid romantic relations with women. A man should take extra precautions to avoid even the most casual contact. Regard them as nuclear waste or a highly contagious disease.
Women are: In violation of the Geneva Convention
Women have no idea what they want, they need to be told and controlled. If you are too nice or become apathetic, you are fucking doomed. Either way, if you get married, you are doomed. Women are cunts, and they are absolute masters of mental torture and abuse. If we simply hired bitches to interrogate and torture all captured terrorists, the war on terror would be over in less than a year.
Women are: Unlovable humans
Men are lovable humans, unlike women. Men are the greatest ever treasure of gold, whom women worthless could never compare to or ever hold a candle to. … the male sex is ever superior to the weaker female one. Men in India are mistreated vis-à-vis females, to get the bitches feel dignified. This is against nature. … Men are taken advantage of by bitches (the woman race). … Woe betide women. I hate them too much, girls too.
NOTE: These comments do not reflect the opinions of all MRAs. But these sorts of things are posted constantly on MRA/MGTOW blogs and message boards, and are rarely challenged. Some, like the first comment here, may even receive multiple upvotes from other readers,
Posted on November 21, 2010, in men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, reactionary bullshit, women are.... Bookmark the permalink. 77 Comments.
>Yeah, you didn't call me a "disgusting mangina," you just called me a "super-mangina." You want me to post more of what was said about this blog in that topic? The whole "cluebatting" squad the guys there sent over to pester me and spam this blog?
>Super-mangina!Consider this as a compliment.Niceguy-Forum has nothing to hide - it is you who is lurking around using a fake-ID.I wonder why you are so afraid to sign up with your regular name in our forum?
>YohanThis conversation interests me, this is my position on the minority of extremists in the mrm.Historically progressivism has taken the behaviour of an extreme minority and used it to stereotypes and marginalize whole groups quite successfully. They did it to Jews, black men in american and today feminism uses the minority of violent men to stereotype and marginalize all men. You see it happening here, the blog is based on the same tactic, a minority of comments are used to stereotype the whole, and its second nature to some of the contributers.So I sometimes wonder why a small portion of the online mens movement so willingly hands over useful propaganda given that its obvious that its going to be used against the whole movements and abuse victims in the way we see here.Rhetorical discipline seems to me to be more beneficial to the movement rather than facilitating the publishing of rhetoric that is damaging.That said I do understand that there is nowhere else to go for men that have been fucked by the system and that its important for them to have support, I just wonder if there is another way given that we know how these people operate.
>"So I sometimes wonder why a small portion of the online mens movement so willingly hands over useful propaganda given that its obvious that its going to be used against the whole movements and abuse victims in the way we see here."Anger, I think. So many men have been hurt so badly by feminism and want to vent, and not everyone is as intellectually disciplined as us. That's not sufficient to explain the REALLY bad comments though(the ones that call George Sodini a hero and Saudi Arabia a model society). I think many of those are posted by feminists themselves to smear us although I do have the displeasure of knowing a few MRAs who actually think these things…
>@Eoghan @ColdIt's a difference if you write a blog yourself and collect solely comments, or if you have to administrate/moderate a forum with many members.What we do with the Niceguy-Forum (and I think, most Men's Rights Forums are doing it in a similar form) is to offer some sectors to our members:Trolleville - for trolls, posting nonsenseOpposing view - might be used by feminists with polite arguments etc.Rants - for angry men, speak out what you think, we will listen.Girls gone wild - Reports about malicious women, criminal women, etc. to show that women are not only 'victims'.Men getting shafted - Reports of men misused by the laws/rulings. Information about laws in USA and also about other countries.Men going their own way - about what I did, and how I did it.There is also some sections for travel, humour and other stuff, computers, even conspiracy theories, religion etc.—- Of course people like David are nitpicking in the RANT section only and ignore all the other stuff in the MRA-forums.Such people like David are unwilling or unable to ask constructive neutral questions, for example: WHY are you an MRA?HOW do you see your life now and your past and future?WHAT do you think, should really be changed in our laws? What is unfair against you? etc.He considers all men with problems regarding females more or less as bad people. There is no male victim in his little mindset. No sincere dialog is therefore possible as he is brainwashed and biased in his opinion.David's communication ability is therefore limited to sign up with a fake-ID lurking in MRAs internet-pages and posting some suggestive comments against men on his blog.About David I guess he is a very lonely, unhappy and narrow-minded person. While he is searching about any bad information regarding MRAs and adores feminists, he remains silent about his own life-style. I noticed also he has no idea about anything beyond the borders of USA.
>I love how the person who posted the bit about women being the missing link knows absolutely nothing about biology. Women can't be the "missing link" you see… Because humans didn't evolve from apes. They have a common ancestor, but we didn't come from chimps. There are two lines of evolution, one for humans, one for apes, they are not one and the same.Also, it's obvious humans are of the same species as men because men and women can produce viable, fertile offspring. If women were "the missing link" we wouldn't be of the same species and won't be able to have babies that could later reproduce.Also, sure. I'll totally give you the "we don't need women anymore bit." Lets say that's true. Okay. Poof. No more women. Now lets see how long the huMAN population survives…Yeah. Biology. It's a wonderful thing.I just want to make one thing clear. I'm a feminist and I'm not here to hold anyone down. -Lexie Di
I certainly understand the male frustration with trying to communicate with people whose point of view can be very, very
different from your own. The game is flawed, but you seem to do better
when you do not return the sarcasm and “hate” that you get from women
and do not “hate” back. There is nothing you can say that will sound
right if you ever get in that position. You try to be yourself and not try to trick or fool anyone and I think that is a good life to lead,
even if there are no women involved.