Fellas! Protect yourself from these sneaky lady tricks!
Courtesy of MGTOWforums.com, here’s a little collection of some of the evil dastardly tricks that women pull on the poor oppressed men of the world. Obviously, most sensible guys know that “housework” is a scam; so-called “housewives” spend most of their time on the couch eating bon bons and watching The View.
But did you know about Arson Night? Or the Cheerleader Ring Drop? Read on, and become enlightened Knowledge is power! STAY SAFE, GUYS!
If a man give his woman 100 dollars a week for food shopping, she will spend say 60 on food and keep the rest. When he enquires why there’s no food in the house come Friday he will get bitched at for not trusting her. And made to feel guilty for accusing her, even though she has deceived him.
They like to lay in bed, and pretend to be sick or sad (which means you won’t be coming in there) and text all their boyfriends.
When they say they are going out with the girls, they could be out doing Anything. This ranges from doing hard drugs to stripping to boinking strangers to sitting alone on a curb to arson. You can never be sure.
How about when they try their version of the Jedi mind trick on you. You know the thing they brag about in private. Trying to make something that’s her idea, seem like it’s *your* idea so that you’ll do it. And then pat you on the back to boost your ego like a trained dog when in reality you did what they for *them* all along.
Sooo many guys fall for this. Suddenly they’re buying crap they don’t need or moving the inlaws in because the woman made it seem like *he* wanted it. Classic.
Short Hair: The Beginning of the End
Women spend so much time on their appearance… why?
That’s right, to catch a sucker into paying the bills. Once the contract is signed, and the babies are popped out, she has you by the balls and doesn’t need to pretend anymore. Next she’ll wear more “comfortable clothes” and cut her hair short. It’s the beginning of the end.
And, yes, The Cheerleader Ring Drop:
In 11th grade high school, I was in the wrestling team. One day, during a water break, this cheerleader next to me started getting panicky and asked me if i could help her find her ring. She “dropped” it and did this just as an opener, i suppose. I ended up ‘being’ with her and it quickly diminished; she was bunk. Another cheerleader came up to me while i was with her and told me “what are you doing her?, you’re way too good for her!”
Luckily, the fella calling himself Tha Big Daddy C-Master, who started the thread, has a simple solution to all this. Well, two simple solutions:
You can always turn the other way, or just use a woman. Human toilets and all.
I couldn’t have said it worse myself!
Posted on December 18, 2011, in $MONEY$, beta males, evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, misogyny. Bookmark the permalink. 961 Comments.
Non-consummation is when two people want to have sex (usually PIV, because yay limited and heteronormative views of sex) but can’t for some reason (vaginismus, psychological issues, erectile dysfunction…).
I definitely agree about that, Holly, particularly since most people aren’t even aware of basic facts like the fact that some antidepressants can reduce your inability to orgasm.
Spear: This is true. Once he has some antidepressants and the rest of his life stabilized, and once I’ve been licensed, I would be glad to treat him for that.
@NWO:
“Was it wrong that women felt cheated when they couldn’t vote?
Was it right that they were angry about it?
My concerns about men are just as valid. If you’re not for men, you’re against men.”
What is the male version of not being able to vote? I feel like this has been asked before with amusing results, and I need to go to bed soon, but still I ask.
Also, I’m surprised at you, a Star Wars fan and all. Only a sith lord deals in absolutes.
@Holly Pervocracy
“No it isn’t. You’re spreading rage on the Internet every moment you’re not working or sleeping. When you talked about having friends over it was a transparent lie even you didn’t try to keep up.”
Again, what you say doesn’t translate into truth. I have no friends. That is the truth according to you. Who would make such an insane statement? You haven’t a clue as to my personal life. Do you? The only reason I don’t even attempt to deny any of it is because it’s pointless. Everyone here knows. They just know. Seriously there is nothing I could say to convince you I have loads of friends and everybody loves me. Is there? So I don’t even bother. It’s pointless.
———————
“Even if your concerns are real, so is the way they’re hurting you. A psychiatrist wouldn’t order you to stop caring about men–they’d try to help you to have a happier and fuller life while still pursuing the things that matter to you.”
Why in the world would I see a psychiatrist? Because a bunch of internet feminists tell me to? Is my life not happy enough? Is it not full enough? You have no idea, yet in your infinite wisdom, you’ve decreed this as a fact.
———————
“I’m all for men. That’s why I want men–even ones I don’t like at all–to be happy and healthy.”
You’re a feminist, you can’t be “for” men.
Do you have the right to life, autonomy, property and vote? That’s all any man has. Feminism is a lie. Those are my rights. Do you want more than that?
———————
The fact is, those gals on the view recieved no punishment.
Answer this three question’s honestly.
If on a mans talk show, men got up and laughed about a woman having her genitals getting cut off, would they have been fired?
Would men as a whole be outraged?
Would they probably have been beaten up by just some random men?
These women suffered no retribution of any kind.
Women as a whole weren’t outraged, (I’ve read the comments on the youtube video).
Not one finger was laid on these women.
I find this completely unacceptable.
1) Maybe. Depends on the ratings of the show and the fuss people cause.
2) Depends on the guy. Some would think it is just good humor; most would be offended.
3) Probably not, and if they were the people who beat them up should go to jail.
You know, I’m also pissed that Sharon Osbourne basically had no consequences for joking about chopping off a dude’s dick. NSWATM covered it extensively (our posts were positively linked to by Ms. Magazine, in fact) and arranged a letter-writing campaign.
I just don’t think it’s the worst issue oppressing men of all time ever.
I give up, NWO. You’re in love with your misery, you can’t conceive of loving anything else, and anyway you’re too misandrist to allow yourself to acknowledge that a man might have difficult feelings and deserve help with them.
So now we’re back to “Every tv show ever run is a constant loop of Sharon Osborne making that one joke, and for that, I want her beaten. Or random women. I just want someone beaten.” And you don’t see what’s wrong with that.
Oh well. You’re the one who has to live with yourself.
I can’t remember any incident of a public figure being physically assaulted over a misogynistic comment. Richard Dawkins got a lot of anger for his “Dear Muslima” comment but was not assaulted. What world is Owly living in, where women release packs of baying manginas on every misogynist?
Also he finds it completely unacceptable that someone was not attacked for their speech. I think in Owlylogic that makes him a Statist. It’s also freaking disgusting.
Today’s ultra-slutty outfit is a pair of oversized black sweatpants that I got for maybe $3 at the local discount store (that I’m pretty sure are actually meant for guys, since the pockets are use-able), a random free t-shirt, a pair of gray sneakers, and an orange hoodie, ’cause it’s near the freezing point outside.
Dear JTK
Please don’t let the door hit your arse on the way out.
@NWOslave
Text Girl sounds clueless and kind of creepy, in my honest opinion. But I find anyone who’s trying to invade my personal bubble kind of creepy, so that just might be me. (I still get twitchy and unhappy when people try to hug me, for example).
Not enough info on the guy.
A piece of advice I’ve heard given to all genders and sexualities. Assuming reciprocity, not a bad bit of advice.
Re: songs. I’ve always been a bit partial to the duet “Broken” by Seether and Amy Lee from Evanescence. Not exactly a love song, but it’s still a great example of the depths of love, IMHO.
@Meller:
re: assuming women are evil
Because that doesn’t seem to be the case?
Lolz. Feminists post love songs -> Love songs are anti-feminist? I don’t get this at all.
Bolding mine.
Now, usually, I’d tell you to replace ‘women’ with ‘blacks’ or ‘Jews’ or something like that, but I don’t feel like that’ll be a convincing tactic with you.
So try this instead: Flip the genders. Would you want to be in a relationship where your partner could override every one of your decisions? If not, why do you want half the population to have that fate?
We’ll start respecting you when you stop wishing servitude on half of the population.
Love, well….that’s quite a bit more personal.
I don’t understand this at all.
I’m not just a feminist. I’m a biologist-in-training who enjoys writing, knitting, and taking on overly-large projects during times where I don’t actually have the time (oh, hai, loft bed/desk/bookshelf thingie I’m planning to build…eventually). I love tea and Bones, and used to enjoy House MD till the Cuddy arc showed up. (Season 8 is showing some promise, but it seems to be, well, rehashings of the first few season now. There’s nothing new.)
I’m obsessed with cephalopods and viruses, and I think that evolution produces some pretty awesome stuff. Not Exactly Rocket Science is one of the blogs I just absolutely love. I like (some) video games, and sometimes play a few when I have the time to do so, but most I just get my computer to play for me (KOLMafia is just awesome).
I will never have nothing to say. And I think that’s true of most people.
Here’s the deal though. Without feminism, I wouldn’t be allowed to say much. Without feminism, I wouldn’t be going to college. Without feminism, I wouldn’t be able to look forward to a satisfying career. In your ideal world, I’d be nothing more than a silent servant. I don’t want to be that.
I’d rather love and have the love of men who respect me and value me as a human being.
Lolz. Typical for one of the immature mindset. “Everyone agrees with me, WAHH! They’re just not willing to say it!”
@No Name:
I don’t see this taunt. Hey, if some men choose to be single, good for them! If other men want partners, good for them too!
(Here’s a little confession. I’m single. Mostly happily so. I want to stay single. None of my friends find anything weird about my stance on being single.)
@Lauralot: Your poem is genius.
@NWO,
You find it reprehensible that people who said something you don’t like weren’t physically beaten?
Dude, you should consider moving to Saudi Arabia. I think you’d fit right in there.
@NWO:
“If on a mans talk show, men got up and laughed about a woman having her genitals getting cut off, would they have been fired?”
You know, try as I may I simply can’t find a clip of this happening. Since there’s no actual evidence, then by NWO’s Law the truth is whatever comes from the ass first, which luckily (since NWO has only ever implied), is this:
The man would not be fired; in fact, he would receive a standing ovation from the crowd, and an emmy and an oscar in the next awards ceremony. Everyone would praise him for his sharp intellectual wit, and he shall be the poster child for the MRA movement. All men everywhere will look upon him in admiration, and women will swoon at his bold alphaness.
…
Wait, Ozy said something first. Crap. Ah well, boring version it is then.
As for what is the biggest issue oppressing men, I do think it’s a bit of an intellectual game as opposed to an actual debate that we need to be having, but I could see reasonable cases for:
-The draft and combat troops all being male
-Bullying and mockery of boys (and, sometimes, men) who are in any way not masculine
-Gender norms encouraging men to neglect their physical and mental health care
-The Success Myth
-The prison-industrial complex’s effects on black men
-The social support gap between men and women
-oys falling behind in education
-Men having the majority of work-related deaths and injuries
-”Boys don’t cry”
Just for Arks, I decided to see what the male/female breakdown was in DC’s “New 52” comics (Yes, I know we’ve moved on but I type slow):
Men:
Action Comics (Superman)
Animal Man
Batwing
Detective Comics (Batman)
Green Arrow
Hawk and Dove
Men of War
O.M.A.C
Static Shock
Swamp Thing
Batman and Robin
Deathstroke
Frankenstein, Agent of S.H.A.D.E.
Green Lantern
Grifter
Mr. Terrific
Resurrection Man
Superboy
Batman
Blue Beetle
Captain Atom
Nightwing
All-Star Western
Aquaman
Batman: The Dark Knight
The Flash
The Fury of Firestorm
I, Vampire
The Savage Hawkman
Superman
Total Comics Focused on Male Characters: 30
Women:
Batgirl
Batwoman
Catwoman
Supergirl
Wonder Woman
Voodoo
Total Comics Focused on Female Characters: 6
Ensemble:
Justice League International (4 men, 4 women)
Stormwatch (4 men, 3 women)
Demon Knights (4 men, 4 women)
Leigon Lost (5 men, 2 women)
Suicide Squad (6 men, 1 woman)
Birds of Prey (4 women)
DC Universe Presents (Focuses on a separate character every five issues, currently focused on Deadman)
Green Lantern Corps (Entire corps, though judging by the covers, majority male)
Legion of Super-Heroes (5 men, 2 women)
Red Hood and the Outlaws (2 men, 1 woman)
Blackhawks (5 men, 2 women)
Green Lantern: New Guardians (5 men, 2 women)
Justice League Dark (4 men, 3 women)
Teen Titans (4 men, 3 women)
Clearly, DC is taking girl power much too far.
Oh, boy, a sexist comic-book fan. I’ve never seen one of those before.
@Amused
Son — personally, it’s not even the fact that you are boring. Nor is the problem that you are “serious” or introverted (read: socially inept). It’s not even the fact that you hate women, though it’s patently clear your misogyny stems from your feelings of inadequacy. No, the biggest problem that I see you have is that you are stupid. VERY stupid. And you are the worst kind of stupid — one who thinks he is a genius and pushes the foulest verbal diarrhea on normal people as a kind of self-affirmation. It’s not even that you can’t think logically — you can’t think at all. I suggest, if you are trying to get a rise out of women with that whole MGTOW nonsense, that you adopt the “silent, mysterious” persona and talk/write as little as possible.
Amused, Final comment from me to you. Over the years, family, friends, coworkers and strangers have told me that a man cannot be complete without a woman. I have always asked them why? Some of the responses that I have gotten are that a woman will balance your life, tame you, be your soul mate, and have sex and children with. I have always said no thanks and thats not for me.
At 36, I have no reason to be an emasculated male like the rest of the married population. I am not a slave and will never be enslaved by women or their oppressive system of divorce and family courts. I will do whatever I want when I want. Some people will call me narcissistic, but I believe freedom is more important. I take care of myself and ask nothing from the government (system) other than being left alone; unlike single mothers.
Virtually all of my MGTOW friends would never post on a forum like this. Whether they are Financial executives or Auto Mechanics, they lead full lives. MGTOW men “ghost” live their lives under the radar. They would never come on a site like manboobz and put themselves in a position to be a some type of “troll” to get mocked. That is why you do not see much MGTOW guys here. The guys are living their lives free of women.If they do go on the internet to dialogue it is usually on sites like Happy Bachelors and MGTOW forums to communicate with other Bachelors. I have only been on this site for a short while, but I guess I was not entertaining enough. It had nothing to do with trying to be attractive to women. I erroneously thought this site manboobz was a more serious feminist- MRA dialogue.I realize it is a humorous sites that mocks MRA’s. MGTOW men are not seeking to get a rise out of women or entertain them to be an entertaining troll, we are just seeking gender separatism.
I’ve learned in my own life’s journey that being complete as a man has little to do with my relationship with a woman. A good woman might fulfill certain physical and emotional needs in my life, and might encourage or discourage me toward the accomplishment of my goals, dream and ambitions. But without the internal drive and determination to pursue my life’s passions and potential, I could never be complete.
Over the year I have seen women for what they are; dream killers and destroyers of sanity. Because of that I have said no thanks and thats not for me. I will continue to go my own way. There are a bunch of guys that have MGTOW but they keep a low profile and would never come on a site like this.
“At 36, ”
Oh, dear god. Really?
.” I erroneously thought this site manboobz was a more serious feminist- MRA dialogue.I realize it is a humorous sites that mocks MRA’s.”
Okay, so now that you realize this, you’re gonna go somewhere else, right? right?
What the hell?!
JTK, did you really just post another wall of text to tell us that you’ve gone your own way?
Dude, just go!
Your freedom is but a click away!
JTK, just go! Be free! Fly away, verbose and dull MGTOW!
Samuel, it’s really obvious it’s you, now go your own way again.
Lauralot, you can’t just break down the numbers like that. The superheroes are all manginas or pussy-whipped he-bitches, and serve the “elite” (other superheroines, their love interests, etc.) to the detriment of their own lives.
History shows us that the oppressed often outnumber the oppressors. It’s akin to looking at medieval society, and claiming the lords were oppressed because they were outnumbered by serfs.
Batman, Superman, Spider-Man… they’re peasants. Serving their lord, that bitch Catwoman.
My husbands best friend is a life time bachelor, fifty years old. He doesn’t hate women, in fact if Kave is busy and we’re not the two of us go out together. Happens at least once a month. He’s just not the marrying or long-term relationship type. His parents (who are like second parents to both of us) don’t give him any flak about it, no one does.
The closest I’ve ever seen anyone question his bachelor status in fifteen years of close friendship was my father. I found out a couple of months ago my dad has always assumed he was gay. No big deal to my dad even though Kave and him go away together on golf vacations at least once a year, he just assumed he was. Besides being a bachelor our friend much like my husband has other stereotypical gaydar characteristics, love of fine food and wine, shopping, they both read GQ etc.
I’m sure every poster here has a friend or relative like him (or her). What makes you different JTK is your need to broadcast your status and why to the world. That isn’t a healthy mindset in my opinion. You don’t come across as a happy person.
I’m… I’m not sure I understand, JTK. Are you saying that you don’t want to marry a woman? I hadn’t gathered that from your thousands of other words on the subject. Perhaps you can write out a treatise explaining exactly why you’ve made this decision, so that we can all be on the same page.
This is sarcasm, by the way. Please, please don’t actually do that.
“Women as a whole weren’t outraged, (I’ve read the comments on the youtube video).”
I actually laughed out loud.
WHo wants to bet that JTK will NOT be able to stick the flounce and will return with his “final last absolutely I promise this time” post again…..and again…..and again….
that sure is a lot of words to say you think girls have cooties
NWOslave, I think one reason that people here think that your life is not happy enough is that you have said both that women and even girls that wear revealing clothes cause you to feel teased, and that to you being teased is actually preferable to rape. So we are faced with the choice to either believe that you have lied about your preference (as an aside, I find that assuming that people with whom I am having a discussion, particularly an online discussion, are lying is in no way productive) or that you are suffering.
You say that you are happy, yet you also say that going to the mall has the high potential to cause you to feel the pain, helplessness, and fear that are typically associated with having a person who’s traits (including sex) you have no control, preforming sexual acts on you with out you consent (the nature of the acts you also have no control over and could therefore include sodomy.) To me, your feeling happy in this state seems deeply tragic, as if you have never felt the sensations that I refer to as happiness. You are happy, despite feeling that being teased is worse than rape and feeling that you are teased when you see girls in capri pants. If I suffered from those feelings from such common stimuli I would probably be an agoraphobic basket case.
I don’t know if your feelings can be altered, but it seems more likely that you could find a way to get passed your feelings of pain, terror, shame, and helplessness upon seeing a 16 year old girl’s calf than you could find a way to prevent yourself from ever seeing one.
Incidentally, NWO - What’s with saying “life, liberty, property” like it’s some little meager consolation prize you should take, and then meekly shut up?
The point, since at least the Enlightenment, has been to treat these as (literally) revolutionary ideas with far reaching, radical implications. What do they mean to you, exactly?
(I didn’t throw in vote, because it’s context dependent. A vote in what system? I am, though you insist I’m pretending, an Anarchist, so a majoritarian democracy such as ours doesn’t fly for me. Also, what would we be voting on? What I would say, however, is that the idea expressed in theory, if not practice, by votes for all is the idea of Lockean equality - Equality of Authority - something transformative and radical, as are the concepts of life, liberty, and property that according to Jeffersonian logic derive from equal creation.These are heavy things with far reaching implications.) Saying “all you get is life liberty and property” is a pretty major head scratcher.
Well, JTK, since you are an idiot, I am safe in assuming that that most people you interact with are likewise on the shallow end of the IQ pool. Any child can realize that marriage is wrong for you because you have nothing to offer to a spouse.
Here’s something I don’t understand about people who claim that the haters of women and the haters of feminism are unrepresentative of the MRM: if men are being persecuted by women and/or feminists, isn’t hatred an eminently reasonable response? Not everyone hatestheir persecutors but saying that someone does is hardly the vilest thing you can say about them.
Slavey:
Why would you want that? Isn’t it better for no one to be violent towards anyone?
Polliwog:
Not everywhere in the U.S.; Florida is one of at least a handful of states that specifically say it’s still rape even then.
And I don’t entirely disagree with that, since sex is not inevitable, and the rhetorical question “her ID checked out, Your Honor, what could I do?” does have an answer.
(On the other hand, it seems to invite honey traps, and while I like to think there’s at least some chance of jury nullification in that case, that doesn’t make it okay)
Slavey:
Yes, but if it were true, it would be bad. The isolated incident you’re going to bring out as a counterexample — and there’s a reason you can only ever find the one — is bad. I disapprove of it. It is better for what hate there is to stop happening than for there to be (as you seem to see it) equal and opposite hate from (in your apparant view) the other side.
Viscaria:
But Spear defined “sexual assault,” leaving Slavey free to assume “rape” is defined as “anything a woman doesn’t like.”
Of course, he’s free to believe that anyway, but it doesn’t make it true.
Dracula:
Sort of like how he relates to women.
Lauralot:
Or that men should be feminized with jewellery.
ithiliana:
The Daily Show has its unfortunate moments of treating women as decoration, or treating men doing anything remotely “feminine” as ridiculous and totally this-never-happens funny, (though only moments). Both of them, especially Stewart, rarely have female guests for serious discussions, though I suspect they’ve each had Elisabeth Warren and Eleanor Holmes Norton on more than Olbermann has had both combined. But I paid too much for my television to refuse to watch anything that’s not 100% clean.
Slavey:
That’s probably the most transparent usage of the equivocation fallacy I’ve seen.
Slavey:
Only a misogynist would say the opposite
No one said this
No one said this
No one said this
The negation of this statement is literally a definition of misogyny.
In some ways this appears to be the case, or at least it’s difficult to prove otherwise, but overall, no one said this.
In many ways, yes
No one said this
An oversimplification, but not outright false.
Slavey:
I don’t watch it either, but I don’t know if they’ve ever talked about that.
The show Sharon Osborne was on was The Talk. They mentioned it a handful of times at most.
Whatever source of information — not that you use sources of information — is telling you that The Talk is nonstop penectomy discussion is simply wrong.
ozy:
Which, it should be notied, Slavey supports.
Also wanted to point out this by JTK:
Color me puzzled. You went your own way, but came to what you thought was a “serious” feminist site to have a dialogue? Well, if that’s the case, then you hadn’t really gone your own way, correct? Also: entitlement, man. You wrote walls of text about how horrible and inhuman and pest-like women are and how much you despise us — and you wanted a discussion about that with us? You expected us to flatter or horrifically inflated ego and dignify your bigotry with a serious debate? You wanted us to put our own humanity in doubt by taking your claims seriously?
“MGTOW men are not seeking to get a rise out of women or entertain them to be an entertaining troll, we are just seeking gender separatism.”
How does coming to a site whose commentariat is majority female and talking to (well, at) them great length achieve the goal of gender separatism?
Unless you’re trying to persuade women to find men so offputting that we decide to go our own way too. That might be successful if we thought all men were a lot like you, but since we do not it just leaves us baffled and bored.
clearly jtk was confused by that thing in the sidebar that says ‘misogyny. i want to have a serious discussion about its merits.’
Meller: Why not assume that these stories are the norm, and for every one that we read about, there are dozens of other such feminists torturing and exploiting men because of simple greed, viciousness, and misandry?
Because it’s not plausible. That was easy.
And, you’re wrong. Not all those songs were written before the middle Seventies.
That was easy too.
NWO: If there are women like that hten women are like that.
Care to sauce the gander with that too… if there are men like that then men are like that.
Shall we say that about rape? How about Abuse?
If there are men like that then all men are like that?
Bullshit. You may hate people so much you won’t individuate them, but I don’t.
JTK: Your list, contradicts itself.
14. A man never engages in conspicuous consumerism.
Does not go with
20. A man must always drive a cool car or motorcycle.
By your list, you aren’t a real man.
1. A man always uses logic when faced with a problem.
3. A man never complains about problems or misfortunes.
Mellerlove: Your ideas for womens’ education are pathetic. They aren’t education, they are slave training. That’s not equality, which means I’m not for it.
Try again deary.
NWO: How stupid do you think we are? You were saying just saying, in this very thread that, “Instead of promoting feminizing men into your frilly dress strap-on debauchery, you should be dragging everyone of these women out into the street and beating the ever loving crap out of them.”
Streets, women, beating: all in your own words.
Your statements on rape are 1: If the woman provokes a man then she deserves to be raped (the whole, sandwich in front of starving people analogy) and 2: that eight year old girls are flaunting their sexuality at the beach.
Since to flaunt is to be deserving of being treated as a slut, and sluts deserve to be raped any eights year old who, “flaunts” is deserving of being raped.
as i’ve said before, most of owlslave’s rants would become immediately more understandable if he would just admit that the only way he knows of responding to a problem is violence
NWO: Name a woman who ever got bloody for a man?
Jeanne D’Arc
Let me summarize spear.
I asked for a MSM news article where women could do more for men. Love men more. Support men more. Help men more.
No one can find one.
that I am willing too admit proves me wrong, not even one of the most popular magazines in America.
FTFY
hellkell: NWO seems to think I’m part of some hivemind. He’s wrong. I was a soldier. I am not non-violent, even if I am somewhat pacifistic. But yes, if I’m wrong, he’s wronger. He’s wrong, even if I’m not. And I’m a feminist.
That’s the part that really sticks in his craw. I ought to be some sort of conservative conspiracy nut looking for excuses to beat women up, and I’m not.
NWO: I don’t care if you are scared or not. If you think beating anyone, because they disagree with you (no matter what they are espousing, be it feminism or anti-Rothchilds (sic) nonsense), I’ll be swinging in the defense of the unjustly attacked.
So I’m willing to get bloody for anyone being unfairly attacked. If a woman were to attack you I’d be swinging at her.
But you don’t get it. You can’t concieve of somone with ideals, not ideology: You will “escalate” against women because you hate them. You don’t care if they are right, merely that they do things which you are against.
That’s where we differ. I have principles I follow, and you have an agenda.
“Name a woman who ever got bloody for a man?”
Mulan! =D She totally fought along side her husband.
Would you want to be in a relationship where your partner could override every one of your decisions? If not, why do you want half the population to have that fate?
Because he’s not part of the other half of the population, duh.
NWO says this crap when women in Cairo are being beaten for standing up for civil rights for everyone. Every one of those women is worth more than 10 of him if he was gold-plated.
Batman, Superman, Spider-Man… they’re peasants. Serving their lord, that bitch Catwoman.
Spider-Man? What does he have to do with Catwoman?
@Dracula, Cat Woman… Black Cat… who can tell the difference when they’re wearing a mask?
@Sniper
Heck, you don’t even have to cross the ocean. Try Oakland. Or New York. Or Seattle.
I think this song really describes human male-female relationships best(if you won’t take if from Pat Benatar, take if from Tina Turner. She would know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqWkFF-TbMU
Nomless: only if you reduce all male-female relationships to heterosexual ones, and ignore, oh, friends, family, collegial relationships which the misogynists/mras tend to do.
Sorry ithiliana, youtube html fail on my part.
I was talking about romance, not platonics FWIW.
Let’s try this again………….Tina Turner knows best:
Nomless: oh, no I know the work well-=am a huge TT fan (and I read the ending of the video as the woman dying, which is so often the patriarchal fate for women).
But my point is that YOUR intro did not specify the m/f relationship as specifically heterosexual — whch, like many other misogynists, MRAs, trolls, is typical. You all fail to see that there are all sorts of human relationships possible between men and women, and you all focus on one very skewed heternormative and patriarchal take on it.
Depressing and boring after a while, especially if one is queer.
Well ithiliana, I was not talking about homosexual relationships and that song is specifically referring to heterosexual romantic relationships(i.e. not platonic). There ARE songs about homosexual relationships but that isn’t one of them……Why are you bringing up heteronormativity? If you wanna talk about same-sex relationships, well….what of it?
Might I add: While some women clearly won’t alow a peen in the back door. Another thing I’m a big fan of is tossing her salad. Do any women here enjoy that or have tried it???
OOPS! Sorry, wrong thrad.