NoMarriages.com Part Two: “American women have personalities similar to the horrible odor they emit.”
Caution: Girls are Stinky
Yesterday we met Zero Tolerance Man, a feisty fellow with lots of strong opinions about the ladies, which he posts in giant letters on his blog NOMARRIAGES.COM. Today I’ve got a few more samples of his timeless wisdom and, as promised, some poetry.
American women have this attitude that they deserve a perfect man; a prince on a white horse who will solve all of their problems, look great, and pay for everything. Instead, most will get the shit sandwich they deserve!
American women are just cum dumpsters; sperm receptacles, and human toilets. They have no other value. A man in the USA MUST remain unmarried and must not impregnate these worthless vile monsters we call:
over the hill, past their sell-by date, ugly wrinkled, worthless piece of shit bitches.
Ever notice how horrible the bathroom smells when an American woman get’s done using it? I have a friend who cleans office buildings and he tells me the women’s bathroom is much filthier than the men’s room. The women piss on the toilet seat, don’t flush, leave used tampons on the floor.American women are truly pigs in most cases. That horrible odor you smell is the toxic residue from their bodies and spirit. …
Most American women stink really badly when they take a dump because of their internal toxicity.
American women have personalities similar to the horrible odor they emit
On the relative values of women and toilet paper:
American Women are the lowest slime on the face of the earth. I wouldn’t use one to wipe my ass with. Even toilet paper has more value than an American women. If any of you feminist bitches are reading this:
“F” YOU, YOU PIECE OF CRAP!!!!
If there are any men here who are inspired enough by these posts to want to take up the “zero tolerance lifestyle, our helpful blogger sets forth a list of rules to guide you on your quest. Two of my favorite:
* The most you should ever pay for is a drink or 2 to get her drunk enough to screw. Do NOT pay for dinners, concerts, travel, or movies. In the USA, you should only be spending time with women if you are screwing them or preparing them with alcohol for sex. Otherwise, you should not be with them at all.
* Do NOT give women any attention in public. Ignore them like they don’t exist in the supermarket, gym, etc. Do not look at them at all. Otherwise, you will be feeding the ego of these attention whores. Don’t give these cunts what they want. No eye contact!!!! Walk past them like the are garbage on the ground. If they speak to you do not answer in any more than 1 word answers. Walk away as quickly as possible.
Let’s end with some excerpts from a little poem ZTM has written for the women of America:
You’re an American woman
You try to make me see
It’s all about you, the hell with me
You’re selfish, you’re spoiled
you put up a front
You’ve got nothing to sell
except your cunt! …
Oprah and Phil have made you feel
Like you were all that
Even though you’re big and fat
You bash all the men and then………….
you think you’re a 10
But you belong in a Pig Pen!
I won’t spend a dime, no matter how you whine
I won’t give you kids or marry you bitch
You’ll ass rape me in court, you wicked witch.
I kick you to the curb of your rotten loser life
I have the last laugh
’cause I didn’t make you my wife!!!!!!!
I find myself agreeing with one of ZTM’s points: it’s for the better if he doesn’t marry. That’s a program I think we can all agree on.
Posted on October 20, 2011, in antifeminism, creepy, disgusting women, evil women, marriage strike, misogyny, oppressed men, precious bodily fluids, rapey, reactionary bullshit, sex, western women suck. Bookmark the permalink. 520 Comments.
Meller: Could it be that “one of your graduate students” was just as obnoxious as the feminists on manboobz. and her husband didn’t have the patience and forebearance that a lot of men have? I don’t condone violence in any form, but his shooting her must have been his response to something really outrageous on her part,
This is more of your typical weasel-worded cowardice. You are afraid to condone violence, in so many words, but she must have “been obnoxious” and driven him to it.
So let’s look at the details.
She left him He hunted her down and shot her in front of their children.
You think she did something to deserve it.
This is what you describe as, Interesting symptoms of hostility here! I can’t say that I am surprised, since even when I do attempt to show sympathy and common interest to people here,
Sympathy…, “bitch probably deserved it, because she was a feminist sort of women, like the rest of you here.” If we extend that logic, you are saying it would be “sad, but understandable” if someone killed us.
Right…
This is why I don’t believe you when you say you don’t dream of the the more violent aspects of Gor. You say you think there are better ways to dominate someone and make them a happy slave than the lash; but you don’t rule it out.
This is why I take your fantasy of enjoying the mass murder of women seriously.
Because you don’t want a partner, you want a slave. Not a real person, but a piece of property you can make cook your food and kiss your ass. Someone you can’t be accued of raping, because legally she can’t be raped; since consent isn’t allowed.
And if she won’t, “happily” submit to that, you say that killing her is not out of the question.
ithiliana: My condolence for Meller abusing you. I am with FelixBC, in that this is the sort of forum where such tales need to be told, but that doesn’t mean it’s either incumbent, nor easy.
Drinks on me if you are ever in NYC.
Bee: 2. Best estimates put false rape accusations in the range of 8%. You’d have a better chance of being falsely accused of theft or assault.
I disagree. I think the best estimate is that it’s in a range between 2-8 percent. I tend toward the lower end of that range myself. I don’t see why false rape (given the invasive, even when not abusive, nature of the response to it), should be higher than other other false accusations, which run in the 2-4 percent range.
Myoo: Oh. My. God. In retrospect, I guess I should have seen that answer coming, but seriously? I’m a firm believer that people can be reasoned with, but I don’t know what to say anymore. It’s like arguing with Stalin here. All that matters is his “vision” and those that don’t fit can be carted off to the Gulags.
No. In MellerLand the expected resolution of feminism is.
1: All the women come to their senses, become compliant, servile and loving. They enjoy being illiterate, and desire nothing more than to make their men happy.
2: They don’t.
If 2 then:
A: Men develop Sexbots and uterine replacement technology.
B: Almost all women are slaughtered.
c: Some women (the prettiest) are kept as sex-slaves for powerful men. The leaders, et al.
KathleenB Adults seek intelligent people to play devil’s advocate in regards to feminism.
The successful applicant will have a sense of humor; able to see the absurd in everyday situations, a solid grasp of rhetoric and a willingness to engage in a losing fight against multiple opponents.
They will have a broad understanding of the historical antecedents of the modern world, esp. as it relates to male/female interaction and the effects of economic marginalisation on the role of women in the pre-modern world.
Will be willing to cite sources when challenged and engage in bantering insults as useful for counterpoint; without resorting to actual interpersonally offensive interactions.
Application will be an open process, with a panel of interlocutors, with knowledge in subject areas from history, economics, fashion, theater, machining; and manufacture, military history, and modern military culture (with various levels of knowledge/interest other periods).
Show your work and be prepared to defend it.
Provide at least three writing samples, on different topics, to ManBoobz
CassandraSays: I love how he keeps coming back to this idea that if men (well, men like him) don’t want “modern women” we will become “obscelete” and thus…what, exactly? We’ll all vanish in a puff of smoke? Men, now content with their new wifebots, will track us all down and murder us?
Yes. He has said this, though I think the real reason for the slaughter of women he dreams of is fear.
“Yes. He has said this, though I think the real reason for the slaughter of women he dreams of is fear.”
He still thinks he lives in the ’50s.
No. He thinks Leave it to Beaver was a documentary.
“Regular men will NEED this, for female companionship, sex, pleasure, domestic serenity, and many other indispensible contributions that real women can and do add to our lives!”
So we’ve now defined “real woman” as “robot”, as opposed to modern flesh and blood women who are not “real”, and we see no irony in this at all?
Oh Meller, don’t ever change. It’s like someone wrote a program that simulates an angry old fart with lady issues, but you’re actually real, and no one had to bother to write the code.
I think I posted this here before but this one’s for Meller =) http://www.themarysue.com/single-women-tips-1938/
The worst thing about Meller is that I’m afraid to post cute cat videos to cancel out his assholery because I know he’ll enjoy them.
Pecunium: That’s… that’s effing perfect. I think the application process would be too much effort for the usual MRA, though - and they’d beg for some sort of ‘affirmative action’ in which the playing field is leveled for their IQ range.
CassandraSays-October 31,2011@6:12pm
C-I am not an “angry old fart with lady issues” at all. At least get your posts correct! I am angry old fart with feminist issues! There is a difference, and a big one!
Ladies can be very nice, and I have no quarrel with them. Feminists, on the other hand…
Meller: Any woman who doesn’t think the way you do… you define as not a lady.
That means you have problems with women.
Mostly that you don’t think them human, and want to keep them from having any agency at all. You want slaves, and believe that, should women refuse to become slaves, that killing them will be acceptable, so that men like you can have the paradise to which you think them entitled.
You are half-proud, of this (you keep repeating it, but when people point it out, you pretend you don’t really mean it).
That’s some pretty fucked up lady-issues, dude.
I went to high school with a number of actual ladies (as in, young women who had titles - Lady Elizabeth Lastname, if you are familiar with the conventions of the British nobility), and not one of them would have the slightest interest in interacting with someone as crass, boorish, and hateful as Meller.
A woman who is very ladylike and has excellent manners may not openly tell you that she despises you, old man, but trust me when I say that she is thinking it even as she sips her tea and pretends that you are not boring her with your endless ill-mannered rants.
C-
When I said that I wanted ladies, I meant real ladies-traditional, loving, attentive, compliant women-NOT stuck up, arrogant, narcissitic, self-absorbed, (probably over-educated to boot) opinionated women! We have too many of THEM nowadays already! Maybe they aren’t full-fledged feminists, but they both are cut from the same cloth.
If she has excellent manners like you say, and a sweet and obliging personality, then she would welcome an honest, forthright, and straightforward advocate for-and from—the male sex! She would have no use for the pathetic henpecked renegade who might say all the “right things” to please nearby females, but makes himself, and other men, look like fools or hapless “dagwood bumsteads” who can only think or say what their wives tell them to. (Sound familiar, Pecunium?). Ladies like her would welcome me for that reason alone, I may not be perfect, but I am no renegade male “doormat” who will sell out his fellows for a kiss (or even a promise of one)!
Yeah, Cassandra, what’s your problem? Don’t you know ladies are defined as women who love DKM?
Then it’s true; there really are no ladies anymore.
Somehow, Meller, I doubt Pecunium’s here for the cookies. You’re just a sad old fart who thinks women aren’t people. You’d be a better class of person if you tried to be more like Pecunium.
Why should having manners mean obliging the likes of you, Meller? Good manners dicate that in person one does not call you a sexist imbecile in the middle of a social event - they do not in any way dicate that one must have a relationship with you or cater to your ridiculous expectations.
Good manners also dictate that one does not make unreasonable demands of other people, such as that they transform themselves into soft fluffy pets for your amusement. Therefore anyone with any manners at all will be sure to find you horrifying to be around. You’re not only boring, you’re fundamentally uncivilised.
You know, Meller, in this “paradise” of yours where women have no education or jobs, what exactly happens to widows? And if all the dangerous jobs go to men, then there will be widows.
Do they cling to their love of their husband and, since they have no earning power of their own, starve to death, or do they marry the first man that shows any interest in them?
In this “paradise” that you propose, how do men know if their wives truly love them or if they’re just pretending in order to avoid starvation?
I love the assumption that it’s an either-or situation. The fact that it’s perfectly possible to hold strong individual opinions without being a rampaging misogynist doesn’t seem to have entered into this particular equation - though of course that’s the combination that most women of my acquaintance would actually go for.
That’s a good point. The MRA’s describe relationships as a power struggle, where one person is in charge and the other is a doormat. They don’t really believe that relationships can be based on equality and cooperation. They believe that women control men, and that they need to take the control back over women. I don’t know how to reason with that, because it’s so far from the reality I know, where many straight people form equal partnerships.
It’s actually a rather sad indication that they’ve probably grown up only ever seeing relationships like this and think that this must be the norm. They literally can’t get their minds around the notion that a marriage really can (and, of course, ideally should) be a partnership of genuine equals - which is certainly true of the happiest, longest-lasting relationships that I know.
Which of course doesn’t mean “equal chores” - my wife is a much better cook than I am, so I simply do more of the cleaning to compensate. Which suits her just fine.
Meller - Could you please provide some names, be they historical or fictional, who exemplify or at least come close to your idea of lady, or true woman?
Why should I? Just so you feminists could criticise them, and me,for choosing them? So that you could find fault with delightful, charming, and often quite beautiful women and girls, while justifying youselves as women(?) completely devoid of humor, charm, playfulness, sexiness (except on the grossest, most elemenal level) fluffiness and femininity?
Get yourself another patsy!
My naming my favorite ladies would merely be giving lumps of coal the opportunity to put down brilliant sparkling diamonds, or giving paper the opportunity to attack 24-carat gold!
Meller: She would have no use for the pathetic henpecked renegade who might say all the “right things” to please nearby females, but makes himself, and other men, look like fools or hapless “dagwood bumsteads” who can only think or say what their wives tell them to. (Sound familiar, Pecunium?).
No.
Take a look at how Rutee and darksidecat and I disagree on the subject of religion.
The thing that galls you isn’t that I am “kowtwing to women to get laid”. No, what galls you is I think them to be people, my equals. As such they are entitled to their opions, even when they disagree with me. They are entitled to do what they want. They need neither my permission, nor approval.
When we diagree, they may convince me, they may not. Just as with a man, or a boy, or a deluded old fart who knows not his ass from his elbow, and couldn’t pour piss out of a boot with the instructions on the bottom.
I am always offended when someone calls me a misogynist. I am not a misogynist. I am a woman hater. There is a world of difference. Misogyny is a feminist term to place a pejorative sentiment to whatever feminist wish to attach it.
I simply hate women after watching them over a life of 50 years, after living with them, after working with them, after seeing them cheat on me and my friends, after having false domestic violence calls made on me 3 times and false sexual harassment 1 time, after having my ex-wife cheat me out of the house by sending by FedEx a rush document to me while she was applying for a second mortgage. The document said “I have nothing to do with this matter’ She told me it meant I had nothing to do with the second mortgage. The document was a Trojan horse where I signed away interest and hundreds of thousands of equity in a house. I trusted her. She was my wife. I was a fool. She is a woman. I have been cheated in the internet 10 times by lying women. I have watched them at work. I have heard story after story from friends. I don’t have time to begin to list the crap and bad behavior I have experienced with women.
No, I am not a misogynist, that made up term to vilify any resistance to feminism. No, I am woman hater with episodes and episodes of experience to back up the reason I hate them. I finally cut them out of my life, completely. And finally, finally I know peace and happiness. I have been without them for 2 years and now I know HAPPINESS IS NOT BEING UNHAPPY. Get rid of women, and not be unhappy, therefore happy.
You do realize misogynist means “woman hater”, right? Like, that’s the definition of the word. Also, why are you telling us? Don’t you have better things to do with your happy, oh I’m sorry, I mean your “not unhappy therefore happy” time?
Marky Mint, misogyny comes from the Greek misogynia to describe certain Greek philosophers’ distaste with women (versus their preference for young men and boys). In other words, ancient misogynists called themselves misogynists. So yeah, it’s a huge made up feminist term.
On a separate note, you trawled the internet for an half a year old blog post to moan generalizations about 50 percent of the human population, and you think you’re a happy guy?
Please do tell us more about this