Man Boobz Ex-Troll Anthony Zarat Has Some Good News and Some Bad News
Dudes! Watch out! This pretty lady is falsely accusing you of something-or-other.
Feeling nostalgic for any of Man Boobz’ classic trolls? Here’s our old friend Anthony Zarat, now a regular Reddit Men’s Rightser, explaining some things about the ladies of today. Note: In order to understand what he’s saying, you need to know that when MRAs talk about “proxy violence,” they mean women calling the police on a dude, which women of course only do when men are completely innocent, because men are always innocent. (Also, in MRAland all police are men, and White Knights to boot.)
I like that he complains about women being “narcissistic,” then invents his own definition of “character” that applies to his own little obsession.
Posted on December 2, 2012, in "proxy violence", evil women, false accusations, men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, misogyny, MRA, narcissism, oppressed men, reddit and tagged men's rights, mgtow, misogyny, MRA, reddit. Bookmark the permalink. 149 Comments.
natfantastic: he’s a socialist who thinks:
I think the real issue is the paternal family structure has collapsed due to technology and its impact on the wages of workers and their ability to maintain monogamous, paternalistic marriages, which require the father to support the family in order to preserve his control over his wife. If I sound like an ersatz Engels, well, it’s because I completely agree with his theory on the family.
So yes, he sounds like an ersatz Engels. I’d say that was truth in advertising.
Shit happens, but it doesn’t mean we need to become Talibama or man-hating Sweden (now that IS an odd culture!)
Our socialist hates Sweden… WTF? Oh, it’s because women are people there. Which can only be reversed (things being what they are) by dismantling the socialist aspects of the state.
Ersatz indeed.
Yes, he’s a complete numpty of a “socialist”, but telling him we need more economic socialism isn’t going to actually lead to discussion with him, you’re in agreement there.
It’s just that if he agrees with you on one issue but is a massive sexist, racist douche-hole everywhere else, we should probably work on the sexist, racist douche-hole bit is all.
natfantastic: I think his other problems are such that, in fact; he’s against the socialist things I support. Take his dislike of single parenting… the only way to “cure” that “problem” is to make sure there is no safety net; so that women need to have a “provider” to “control” them.
His desired end state is such that a socialist society can’t be the model.
@Anon
so pathetically human
As opposed to…?
The thing is, any man who has ever been alone with a woman for an extended period of time and had nothing happen to him (which I wager is the vast majority of the time men and women who aren’t romantically or sexually involved and spend time alone together because most people are decent and actually pretty awesome) can attest to the total not-trueness of this idea of guilt by proxy.
It’s like the reverse werewolf boner for MRAs. Instead of the traditional “of course he wanted sex, it was late and you were with him ALONE!” that gets bandied about at date rape survivors, it’s “of course she assumed you were going to rape her! You were alone together for hours and misandry says all men are rapists!” (nevermind how contradictory THOSE statements are. Srsly, if you don’t want all women thinking you’re potential rapists, stop trying to normalize rape by suggesting that all men are potential rapists).
I work with a lot of men who mentor a lot of very beautiful young women and to my knowledge, none of them has this harrowing, visceral fear of being wrongly accused of harassment or assault (nor to my knowledge, have any of them experienced such accusations during their careers). Of course, they’re also not delusional douchebags who engage in victim-blaming “you got too close to his potential boner!” garbage, nor are they dudes who are so hopefully insecure as to feel the need to financially entrap a woman in order to keep her as a partner.
balls, that’s HOPELESSLY, not “hopefully”
Wow, Anon might be the weakest troll I’ve ever seen, actually arguing themself out of the picture, and then leaving with a headache.
Seriously, even Explore Nature had better staying power!
I hereby resolve to always follow people’s links to Wikipedia articles, lest I again fail to do so and be DOOMED.
the 2012 Zarat Dicktionary definition of character is so vague and specific at the same time